Betsy Devine: Funny ha-ha and/or funny peculiar

I went to a book talk at the Harvard Coop tonight (admittedly to check out the venue–Frank is giving a talk there tomorrow night.)

I came away with a new, optimistic critique of amoral globalization that goes beyond the usual “warmed-over Marxism, self-indulgent postmodernism, or insular fundamentalism,” to quote Harvard lecturer Adam K. Webb, author of Beyond the Global Culture War.

Webb gives a passionate though scholarly argument for social justice and the civilizing power of shared traditions. Like some others in the audience, I’d be more enthused about strong traditionalists (e.g. the Christian Right) if they fought economic wrongs instead of obsessing about other people’s sexuality. But whether or not I end up agreeing with Webb (I bought his book), I was relieved to hear some new thoughts on troubling issues that very much need new solutions.

Meanwhile, here’s what I learned about Harvard Coop book-signings:

• Although the official starting time was 7, most of the audience arrived between 7 and 7:10. Wisely, the reading wasn’t started until then.
• Richard (I don’t know his last name), who works for the Coop, gave an interesting and knowledgeable introduction before Adam Webb began. Apparently, he introduces all the speakers.
• Webb didn’t read from his book–he gave about a 20-minute summary of its arguments, and then took questions.
• The crowd was a mixture–curious people like me plus a bunch of Webb’s students who sat near the back. Richard says that the size of the crowd is unpredictable–he’s seen as few as 2 people and as many as 50.

I’ve been reading about book-signings on the web–one of the things I’ve seen recommended is to make bookmarks about your book. So I did spend quite a lot of today designing one for Fantastic Realities, but now I’m not sure how appropriate it would be to bring to the Coop.

Anyway, if you’re in the Harvard Square area on Tuesday, May 2, 2006, at 7 p.m., Frank Wilczek and I will be up on Level 3 of the Harvard Coop Bookstore, talking about Fantastic Realities, and I’ll give you one of my bookmarks if you want one.

If some bloggers come, it’d truly be fantastic.

Mike Gehrke at SenateMajority.com calls BS on yet another Republican bigshot who claims a lot more distance from the phone-jamming scandal than he deserves. Convicted phone-jamming felon James Tobin of Maine had impressive GOP affiliations of his own: National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee ’02 (New England regional director) Bush-Cheney ’04 (New England campaign chairman) Bush Ranger ’04 (as were Jack Abramoff, Kenneth Lay, and Duke Cunningham) Beneficiary of million$ in legal defense funds from the Republican National Committee But there are many bigger political fish than James Tobin in the murkier parts of the national politics pond. Thanks to Mike Gehrke and the NH Democratic Party for shining a spotlight into places no spotlight has gone before–regions much closer to DC than to NH!

Bonus link: Great political rant by Josh Marshall of TalkingPointsMemo.

Einstein once tried to cheer up a dejected parrot by telling it jokes. Years later, Sci Am podcaster Steve Mirsky claimed he found the parrot (there’s some uncertainty here) and tape-recorded its memories:

“How do I order beer in a bar? I say ‘Ein stein for Einstein.’ Hey, Parrot, what’s the difference between a wild boar and Niels Bohr? When I say that God doesn’t play dice, a wild boar doesn’t tell me to stop telling God what to do. I hate that. So what do you say to the man who developed the exclusion principle? You say, ‘Pauli want a cracker?’ Wolfgang Pauli, get it? Hello, is this thing on? Testing, one, two. Hey, Parrot, I had a dream where I made love to Rita Hayworth for an hour. Well, for her it was an hour. For me, 35 seconds. That’s relativity. Okay, Newton is standing on the shoulders of a giant…

Steve’s sense of humor might be one reason people love his podcast…

I’m looking forward to hearing how his podcast with both Frank and me will turn out–it’s due May 3. Anyway, it was fun meeting Steve backstage at the NYC book party…and, as for his podcast–subscribed!

AP reporter Larry Margasak followed the money that paid for Republican dirty phone tricks during the 2002 federal elections. He discovered that an early prime investor in GOP Marketplace, Allen Raymond’s telemarketing services company, was GOP insider Haley Barbour. According to Wikipedia, Barbour held the same position in Ronald Reagan’s White House that Ken Mehlman had when his White House office got those hundreds of phone call from busy phone jammers:

…Barbour was President Ronald Reagan’s Director of the White House Office of Political Affairs for two years…Barbour later served as chairman of then-Governor George W. Bush’s presidential campaign advisory committee in 2000…

In 1991, Barbour helped found Barbour, Griffith & Rogers, a Washington, D.C.-based lobbying firm, with Lanny Griffith and Ed Rogers, two lawyers who formerly worked in the George H. W. Bush administration. In 1998, Fortune Magazine named Barbour Griffith & Rogers the second-most-powerful lobbying firm in America. In 2001, after the inauguration of George W. Bush, Fortune named it the most powerful.

Margasak’s article also details the other known 2002 GOP Marketplace dirty phone trick, attack calls made during the Super Bowl.

In related and recent news, Republicans got caught attacking Democrats with anonymous robocalls in Illinois. They defended their action (after denying it) by claiming that a loophole allowed them to do it.

Last week, a few Democratic House members said their constituents were getting
prerecorded phone calls at home, in which a voice would allege that the
legislator was cutting state pensions and veterans’ funds. The recording would
implore the listener to tell the legislator to oppose the budget practices of
Gov. Rod Blagojevich, a Democrat.

The calls didn’t identify who they were from. After initial denials, Republican
House officials last week acknowledged they were behind the phone campaign.
They said the program, which cost “less than $10,000” in party funds, was
designed to put pressure on Democrats to stop backing what Republicans see as
dangerous budget maneuvers by the Blagojevich administration.

The exploitiation of loopholes like this is just what you’d expect from a party hierarchy where lobbyists are accepted and welcome partners in national politics.

Newspapers and this blog have talked about three appeals made by James Tobin’s lawyers after his conviction for Phone Jammer Gate. Are they meaningful objections… or just one more excuse to keep Tobin from being questioned under oath in the civil suit against the RNC?

Now, with her permission, I welcome guest blogger Marie Devine, Attorney at Law, whose (informal) opinion is more educated than mine.

Hi Bets,

Thanks for the documents.

First, I must give the following “caveat”: I do not now and have never practiced criminal law in either State or Federal courts. My own litigation experience is mostly in civil litigation and though I’m licensed to practice in NH. I have not actively practiced law in NH since 1987. Most of my legal experience has been in the State of Florida.

That said, I can provide some general legal information that is pertinent.

As to our earlier discussion on news reports that Tobin has “appealed”:

His attorneys have not filed an “appeal”. What they have filed are post-judgement motions in the Federal District Court of NH –which was the trial court. An “appeal” is an action filed in the court having appellate jurisdiction over the trial court, which in this case would be the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (the circuit within which NH sits). The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit is located in Boston. Appeals from rulings made by the Courts of Appeals go to the US Supreme Court in Washington.

Anyway, the Motions filed ask for: “Arrest of Judgment”, “Acquittal”, and a new trial. The arguments put forth in the Motions are all issues that were considered and denied by the trial judge during the trial. In other words, they are a rehash of the same old defense arguments. Such motions are rarely granted by trial judges, who have already carefully considered the issues, the facts, and the law and who have already ruled on them.

Th docket reveals that these motions were argued before the judge on March 17, 2006 and “taken under advisement” by the Judge. Apparently, he has not yet ruled.

So, the case basically sits in limbo right now. Appeal, at this point, would be premature, as the trial court is still considering the post-judgment motions. Works for them!!

Love, Ri

Luboš Motl’s Reference Frame is an extremely popular physics blog–in fact, the number one Google result for “frank wilczek blog.” Luboš is offering a prize to his 400,000th visitor–and the same prize to visitor number 400,001, 400,002, 400,003, or 400,004–the opportunity to write a guest post there. But hustle on over there if you want to win; he’s already up to 399,679.

In other Luboš news, he is very kindly attempting to double (or do I mean halve? the nice one of those two) the Amazon rank of the now almost-officially-released Fantastic Realities.

Thanks, Luboš, and I hope those big-number visitors add interesting and amusing posts to your own collection.

RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman defended the phone-jammers’ calls to the White House as just plain politics as usual: “…during the 2002 election cycle, my staff and I regularly communicated with competitive Congressional campaigns and Republican Party organizations…Alicia Davis, my deputy responsible for the Northeast, frequently communicated with the New Hampshire State Party, the RNC and others.“

The only problem with that “defense” is that letting US taxpayers foot the bill as White House staffers work for the Republican party comprehensively violates the Hatch Act–for example,

…a District of Columbia employee may not perform partisan campaign duties during the course of the employee’s normal business day if the employee is: (1) on duty; (2) in any room or building occupied in the discharge of official duties by an individual employed or holding office in the Government of the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof; or (3) wearing an official uniform or insignia.

…an employee may not write campaign speeches, make political calls, or send political emails on behalf of a partisan candidate or political party while the employee is in any room or building occupied in the discharge of official duties by an individual employed or holding office in the Government of the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof, even if he is not “on duty” for purposes of the Hatch Act.

The NH Democrats have filed a civil suit asking the GOP to reimburse them for the cost of their GOTV efforts in 2002. I’d like to see something else added to the lawsuit–for the RNC to reimuburse US taxpayers for the campaign activities Ken Mehlman brazenly admits were carried out from within the White House itself.

Wow–Fantastic Realities got its blog-launch yesterday–thanks to Luboš Motl, whose energetic efforts pushed its Amazon rank up from #136,000 yesterday morning to an overall rank of #24,099 yesterday and #7,389 so far today….

If this continues, Fantastic Realities should hit number one at Amazon sometime during the night and go into negative numbers by the time it’s officially published–which is tomorrow.

Tomorrow, Frank and I head to NYC for the book’s official launch in real space and time. Then on Friday, Frank is giving a talk and signing some books at CUNY’s Graduate Center, Fifth Avenue at 34th Street–3:30 p.m., it’s free if you don’t buy a book there. The hometown launch is a talk and book-signing at the Harvard Square Coop Bookstore on May 2, 7 p.m. It seems like only yesterday that I was just force-fitting this blog’s saga of Nobel adventures into manuscript form (goodbye to reverse chronological order!)

Most of the book, however, is assorted short pieces by Frank, who goes around winning awards for his science writing when he’s not getting Nobel Prizes or packing his suitcase.

I’ll be blogging more practical details as we go along with this adventure, because it’s my firm belief that many a blog out there ought to end up as a published book–or (like mine) as a part of published book.

Yes, it’s a lot of work, but it’s also great fun.